The attorneys are always busy, hopefully, working on that they do best, practicing law and rack-up billable hours. The attorneys rely on their administrative staff to run the operations.
There is no similar situation in corporate America, the people doing a great deal of the work and billing the most, are also the owners, the partners. There isn’t just one “CEO”, there are dozens, they form committees, many times made up with members who just love to over-analyze and debate. So how does this effect inefficiencies, it promotes it on the operations side of the business.
If a corporate CEO analyzed a mid-large size law firm roughly the same size as his business, he’d be amazed at the operational inefficiencies. Corporate CEO’s, in general, have discovered that operational efficiency quickly equate to bottom line profits. The CEO passes down to his vice-presidents and managers the requirement to be low cost producers. The CEO doesn’t need to be concerned about a few dozen other owners when it comes to lowering the cost of operations.
Law firm managers might believe they have the responsibility and authority to streamline operations and reduce the internal costs of processing. However, just try and reduce the manual paper process and you’ll have a partner up in arms over something. Process improvement is very important, so long as no one is inconvenienced.
Law firms are always looking for a competitive edge in pursuing client engagements. Clients are looking for law firms that they believe are efficiently run.
So the moral of the story is: don’t let your corporate CEO client spend a lot of time with your operational staff, inefficiencies will not be good for business.




